Review



mouse anti zeb1 antibody  (Bioss)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bioss is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bioss manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Bioss mouse anti zeb1 antibody
    Mouse Anti Zeb1 Antibody, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti zeb1 antibody/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 2 article reviews
    mouse anti zeb1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Bioss mouse anti zeb1 antibody
    Mouse Anti Zeb1 Antibody, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti zeb1 antibody/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti zeb1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti zeb1
    Anti Zeb1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti zeb1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti zeb1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti zeb1
    Mouse Anti Zeb1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti zeb1/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti zeb1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Boster Bio rabbit polyclonal anti human mouse zeb1 antibody
    KEY RESOURCES TABLE
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Human Mouse Zeb1 Antibody, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti human mouse zeb1 antibody/product/Boster Bio
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti human mouse zeb1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bioss mouse anti zeb1 mab
    KEY RESOURCES TABLE
    Mouse Anti Zeb1 Mab, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti zeb1 mab/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti zeb1 mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    OriGene zeb1
    A . Western blot analyses for <t>ZEB1</t> after introduction of an shZEB1 expressing vector into different 53BP1-KO clones. B . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the parental cell line (shCTRL). p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant. C . Western blot analyses showing the evolution of the DNA damage marker γH2AX in HCT116 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the control (shCTRL). Also shown are the effects of this expression on ZEB1 and Slug. D . Western blot analyses showing the impact on EMT markers as well as the DNA damage marker γH2AX of forced expression of TWIST1 in PNT1A cells. E . DNA damage recovery assay in HCT116 cells, WT and KO for 53BP1, and depleted or not for ZEB1. Cells were treated (or not, U) with etoposide (2 µM for 24h) before medium change (0 hr) and let to recover for 6 hours. Shown here are western blot analyses for DNA damage markers γ-ATP and γH2AX. F . Western blot analyses for ZEB1, Slug and RAD51 after introduction of a vector expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug into WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells. G . Quantification of γH2AX and RAD51 foci detected by immunofluorescence in WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug. p values from paired comparisons against the control (shCTRL) are indicated. H . Results from Cut&Run experiments using HCT116 cells and either anti-ZEB1 (bottom left) or anti-Slug (bottom right) antibodies for chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by enrichment analyses of two amplified DNA fragments (P1, P2) within the promoter region (ENSEMBL coordinates are indicated) of the RAD51 gene, shown here to span two small regions right upstream of the transcription initiation site (indicated by an arrow). HCT116 cells were either untreated (UT) or transduced with vectors expressing either shZEB1 (bottom left) or shSlug (bottom right). Positive control included an antibody against the histone mark H3K27me3. All PCR signals were normalized to the result obtained with positive antibody control (H3K27m3) and then to an amplified Alu fragment. Significant differences between WT and shZEB1 and shSLUG from multiple t-tests (adjusted) are indicated. * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001; **** , p < 0.0001.
    Zeb1, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/zeb1/product/OriGene
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    zeb1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Selleck Chemicals zeb1 anti tgf β1 lps anti tgf β1
    A . Western blot analyses for <t>ZEB1</t> after introduction of an shZEB1 expressing vector into different 53BP1-KO clones. B . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the parental cell line (shCTRL). p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant. C . Western blot analyses showing the evolution of the DNA damage marker γH2AX in HCT116 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the control (shCTRL). Also shown are the effects of this expression on ZEB1 and Slug. D . Western blot analyses showing the impact on EMT markers as well as the DNA damage marker γH2AX of forced expression of TWIST1 in PNT1A cells. E . DNA damage recovery assay in HCT116 cells, WT and KO for 53BP1, and depleted or not for ZEB1. Cells were treated (or not, U) with etoposide (2 µM for 24h) before medium change (0 hr) and let to recover for 6 hours. Shown here are western blot analyses for DNA damage markers γ-ATP and γH2AX. F . Western blot analyses for ZEB1, Slug and RAD51 after introduction of a vector expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug into WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells. G . Quantification of γH2AX and RAD51 foci detected by immunofluorescence in WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug. p values from paired comparisons against the control (shCTRL) are indicated. H . Results from Cut&Run experiments using HCT116 cells and either anti-ZEB1 (bottom left) or anti-Slug (bottom right) antibodies for chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by enrichment analyses of two amplified DNA fragments (P1, P2) within the promoter region (ENSEMBL coordinates are indicated) of the RAD51 gene, shown here to span two small regions right upstream of the transcription initiation site (indicated by an arrow). HCT116 cells were either untreated (UT) or transduced with vectors expressing either shZEB1 (bottom left) or shSlug (bottom right). Positive control included an antibody against the histone mark H3K27me3. All PCR signals were normalized to the result obtained with positive antibody control (H3K27m3) and then to an amplified Alu fragment. Significant differences between WT and shZEB1 and shSLUG from multiple t-tests (adjusted) are indicated. * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001; **** , p < 0.0001.
    Zeb1 Anti Tgf β1 Lps Anti Tgf β1, supplied by Selleck Chemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/zeb1 anti tgf β1 lps anti tgf β1/product/Selleck Chemicals
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    zeb1 anti tgf β1 lps anti tgf β1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Boster Bio human mouse zeb1 antibody bosterbio
    A . Western blot analyses for <t>ZEB1</t> after introduction of an shZEB1 expressing vector into different 53BP1-KO clones. B . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the parental cell line (shCTRL). p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant. C . Western blot analyses showing the evolution of the DNA damage marker γH2AX in HCT116 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the control (shCTRL). Also shown are the effects of this expression on ZEB1 and Slug. D . Western blot analyses showing the impact on EMT markers as well as the DNA damage marker γH2AX of forced expression of TWIST1 in PNT1A cells. E . DNA damage recovery assay in HCT116 cells, WT and KO for 53BP1, and depleted or not for ZEB1. Cells were treated (or not, U) with etoposide (2 µM for 24h) before medium change (0 hr) and let to recover for 6 hours. Shown here are western blot analyses for DNA damage markers γ-ATP and γH2AX. F . Western blot analyses for ZEB1, Slug and RAD51 after introduction of a vector expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug into WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells. G . Quantification of γH2AX and RAD51 foci detected by immunofluorescence in WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug. p values from paired comparisons against the control (shCTRL) are indicated. H . Results from Cut&Run experiments using HCT116 cells and either anti-ZEB1 (bottom left) or anti-Slug (bottom right) antibodies for chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by enrichment analyses of two amplified DNA fragments (P1, P2) within the promoter region (ENSEMBL coordinates are indicated) of the RAD51 gene, shown here to span two small regions right upstream of the transcription initiation site (indicated by an arrow). HCT116 cells were either untreated (UT) or transduced with vectors expressing either shZEB1 (bottom left) or shSlug (bottom right). Positive control included an antibody against the histone mark H3K27me3. All PCR signals were normalized to the result obtained with positive antibody control (H3K27m3) and then to an amplified Alu fragment. Significant differences between WT and shZEB1 and shSLUG from multiple t-tests (adjusted) are indicated. * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001; **** , p < 0.0001.
    Human Mouse Zeb1 Antibody Bosterbio, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human mouse zeb1 antibody bosterbio/product/Boster Bio
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human mouse zeb1 antibody bosterbio - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology zeb1 416a7h10 mouse mab
    A . Western blot analyses for <t>ZEB1</t> after introduction of an shZEB1 expressing vector into different 53BP1-KO clones. B . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the parental cell line (shCTRL). p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant. C . Western blot analyses showing the evolution of the DNA damage marker γH2AX in HCT116 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the control (shCTRL). Also shown are the effects of this expression on ZEB1 and Slug. D . Western blot analyses showing the impact on EMT markers as well as the DNA damage marker γH2AX of forced expression of TWIST1 in PNT1A cells. E . DNA damage recovery assay in HCT116 cells, WT and KO for 53BP1, and depleted or not for ZEB1. Cells were treated (or not, U) with etoposide (2 µM for 24h) before medium change (0 hr) and let to recover for 6 hours. Shown here are western blot analyses for DNA damage markers γ-ATP and γH2AX. F . Western blot analyses for ZEB1, Slug and RAD51 after introduction of a vector expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug into WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells. G . Quantification of γH2AX and RAD51 foci detected by immunofluorescence in WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug. p values from paired comparisons against the control (shCTRL) are indicated. H . Results from Cut&Run experiments using HCT116 cells and either anti-ZEB1 (bottom left) or anti-Slug (bottom right) antibodies for chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by enrichment analyses of two amplified DNA fragments (P1, P2) within the promoter region (ENSEMBL coordinates are indicated) of the RAD51 gene, shown here to span two small regions right upstream of the transcription initiation site (indicated by an arrow). HCT116 cells were either untreated (UT) or transduced with vectors expressing either shZEB1 (bottom left) or shSlug (bottom right). Positive control included an antibody against the histone mark H3K27me3. All PCR signals were normalized to the result obtained with positive antibody control (H3K27m3) and then to an amplified Alu fragment. Significant differences between WT and shZEB1 and shSLUG from multiple t-tests (adjusted) are indicated. * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001; **** , p < 0.0001.
    Zeb1 416a7h10 Mouse Mab, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/zeb1 416a7h10 mouse mab/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    zeb1 416a7h10 mouse mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti zeb1
    A . Western blot analyses for <t>ZEB1</t> after introduction of an shZEB1 expressing vector into different 53BP1-KO clones. B . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the parental cell line (shCTRL). p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant. C . Western blot analyses showing the evolution of the DNA damage marker γH2AX in HCT116 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the control (shCTRL). Also shown are the effects of this expression on ZEB1 and Slug. D . Western blot analyses showing the impact on EMT markers as well as the DNA damage marker γH2AX of forced expression of TWIST1 in PNT1A cells. E . DNA damage recovery assay in HCT116 cells, WT and KO for 53BP1, and depleted or not for ZEB1. Cells were treated (or not, U) with etoposide (2 µM for 24h) before medium change (0 hr) and let to recover for 6 hours. Shown here are western blot analyses for DNA damage markers γ-ATP and γH2AX. F . Western blot analyses for ZEB1, Slug and RAD51 after introduction of a vector expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug into WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells. G . Quantification of γH2AX and RAD51 foci detected by immunofluorescence in WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug. p values from paired comparisons against the control (shCTRL) are indicated. H . Results from Cut&Run experiments using HCT116 cells and either anti-ZEB1 (bottom left) or anti-Slug (bottom right) antibodies for chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by enrichment analyses of two amplified DNA fragments (P1, P2) within the promoter region (ENSEMBL coordinates are indicated) of the RAD51 gene, shown here to span two small regions right upstream of the transcription initiation site (indicated by an arrow). HCT116 cells were either untreated (UT) or transduced with vectors expressing either shZEB1 (bottom left) or shSlug (bottom right). Positive control included an antibody against the histone mark H3K27me3. All PCR signals were normalized to the result obtained with positive antibody control (H3K27m3) and then to an amplified Alu fragment. Significant differences between WT and shZEB1 and shSLUG from multiple t-tests (adjusted) are indicated. * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001; **** , p < 0.0001.
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Zeb1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti zeb1/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti zeb1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    KEY RESOURCES TABLE

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: Breast cancer cell mesenchymal transition and metastasis directed by DAP5/eIF3d-mediated selective mRNA translation

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112646

    Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE

    Article Snippet: Rabbit polyclonal anti-human/mouse Zeb1 antibody , BosterBio , Cat# A00548-1/RRID N/A.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Staining, Protease Inhibitor, Virus, Reverse Transcription, SYBR Green Assay, Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay, MTT Assay, Software, Imaging

    A . Western blot analyses for ZEB1 after introduction of an shZEB1 expressing vector into different 53BP1-KO clones. B . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the parental cell line (shCTRL). p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant. C . Western blot analyses showing the evolution of the DNA damage marker γH2AX in HCT116 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the control (shCTRL). Also shown are the effects of this expression on ZEB1 and Slug. D . Western blot analyses showing the impact on EMT markers as well as the DNA damage marker γH2AX of forced expression of TWIST1 in PNT1A cells. E . DNA damage recovery assay in HCT116 cells, WT and KO for 53BP1, and depleted or not for ZEB1. Cells were treated (or not, U) with etoposide (2 µM for 24h) before medium change (0 hr) and let to recover for 6 hours. Shown here are western blot analyses for DNA damage markers γ-ATP and γH2AX. F . Western blot analyses for ZEB1, Slug and RAD51 after introduction of a vector expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug into WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells. G . Quantification of γH2AX and RAD51 foci detected by immunofluorescence in WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug. p values from paired comparisons against the control (shCTRL) are indicated. H . Results from Cut&Run experiments using HCT116 cells and either anti-ZEB1 (bottom left) or anti-Slug (bottom right) antibodies for chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by enrichment analyses of two amplified DNA fragments (P1, P2) within the promoter region (ENSEMBL coordinates are indicated) of the RAD51 gene, shown here to span two small regions right upstream of the transcription initiation site (indicated by an arrow). HCT116 cells were either untreated (UT) or transduced with vectors expressing either shZEB1 (bottom left) or shSlug (bottom right). Positive control included an antibody against the histone mark H3K27me3. All PCR signals were normalized to the result obtained with positive antibody control (H3K27m3) and then to an amplified Alu fragment. Significant differences between WT and shZEB1 and shSLUG from multiple t-tests (adjusted) are indicated. * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001; **** , p < 0.0001.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: DNA damage-induced PARP/ALC1 activation leads to Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition stimulating homologous recombination

    doi: 10.1101/2024.01.16.575847

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A . Western blot analyses for ZEB1 after introduction of an shZEB1 expressing vector into different 53BP1-KO clones. B . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the parental cell line (shCTRL). p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant. C . Western blot analyses showing the evolution of the DNA damage marker γH2AX in HCT116 53BP1-KO clones expressing shZEB1 as compared to the control (shCTRL). Also shown are the effects of this expression on ZEB1 and Slug. D . Western blot analyses showing the impact on EMT markers as well as the DNA damage marker γH2AX of forced expression of TWIST1 in PNT1A cells. E . DNA damage recovery assay in HCT116 cells, WT and KO for 53BP1, and depleted or not for ZEB1. Cells were treated (or not, U) with etoposide (2 µM for 24h) before medium change (0 hr) and let to recover for 6 hours. Shown here are western blot analyses for DNA damage markers γ-ATP and γH2AX. F . Western blot analyses for ZEB1, Slug and RAD51 after introduction of a vector expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug into WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells. G . Quantification of γH2AX and RAD51 foci detected by immunofluorescence in WT or 53BP1-KO HCT116 cells expressing either shZEB1 or shSlug. p values from paired comparisons against the control (shCTRL) are indicated. H . Results from Cut&Run experiments using HCT116 cells and either anti-ZEB1 (bottom left) or anti-Slug (bottom right) antibodies for chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by enrichment analyses of two amplified DNA fragments (P1, P2) within the promoter region (ENSEMBL coordinates are indicated) of the RAD51 gene, shown here to span two small regions right upstream of the transcription initiation site (indicated by an arrow). HCT116 cells were either untreated (UT) or transduced with vectors expressing either shZEB1 (bottom left) or shSlug (bottom right). Positive control included an antibody against the histone mark H3K27me3. All PCR signals were normalized to the result obtained with positive antibody control (H3K27m3) and then to an amplified Alu fragment. Significant differences between WT and shZEB1 and shSLUG from multiple t-tests (adjusted) are indicated. * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001; **** , p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: ZEB1 (Origene, # TA802298) and Slug (Origene, # OTI1A6) antibodies were used.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Clone Assay, Marker, Control, Immunofluorescence, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Amplification, Transduction, Positive Control

    A . U2OS cells expressing a GFP-ZEB1 fusion protein were micro-irradiated with laser under the microscope across nuclei and the recruitment of the fluorescent protein was followed and quantified at different time points. Cells were treated or not with Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, at 5µM. B . Similar experiments were carried out with U2OS cells that had been inactivated for ALC1. C-D . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO HEK-Early cells ( C ) and in 53BP1-KO PNT1A cells ( D ) treated with Olaparib at the dose and time indicated, as compared to untreated cells. p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant. E . Western blot analyses of EMT-TFs, Vimentin, RAD51 and γH2AX in 53BP1-KO PNT1A cells before and after treatment with Olaparib. F . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO PNT1A cells that were also inactivated for ALC1. p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: DNA damage-induced PARP/ALC1 activation leads to Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition stimulating homologous recombination

    doi: 10.1101/2024.01.16.575847

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A . U2OS cells expressing a GFP-ZEB1 fusion protein were micro-irradiated with laser under the microscope across nuclei and the recruitment of the fluorescent protein was followed and quantified at different time points. Cells were treated or not with Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, at 5µM. B . Similar experiments were carried out with U2OS cells that had been inactivated for ALC1. C-D . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO HEK-Early cells ( C ) and in 53BP1-KO PNT1A cells ( D ) treated with Olaparib at the dose and time indicated, as compared to untreated cells. p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant. E . Western blot analyses of EMT-TFs, Vimentin, RAD51 and γH2AX in 53BP1-KO PNT1A cells before and after treatment with Olaparib. F . Relative mRNA level of expression of epithelial and EMT markers in 53BP1-KO PNT1A cells that were also inactivated for ALC1. p values from paired comparisons are indicated. NS: non-significant.

    Article Snippet: ZEB1 (Origene, # TA802298) and Slug (Origene, # OTI1A6) antibodies were used.

    Techniques: Expressing, Irradiation, Microscopy, Western Blot